You're Not In Love, You're In Control: Why Secure Attachment Is Still a Cage

You're Not In Love, You're In Control: Why Secure Attachment Is Still a Cage

Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

There's a word most people have never heard. It comes from non-monogamous communities, which means a lot of people in traditional relationships will dismiss it before they even understand it. That would be a mistake, because this word redefines love more precisely than anything I've encountered in seven-plus years of living inside a conscious relationship and working as a coach.

The word is compersion.

Compersion is the felt experience of wholehearted joy for your partner's joy. Not joy because their happiness benefits you. Not relief because them being happy means you get to relax. Just pure, clean delight that the person you love is experiencing something good.

In non-monogamous communities, this word emerged to describe something specific: the ability to feel genuine happiness watching your partner experience love or pleasure or deep connection with someone else. And I know that for most people reading this, that sounds extreme. Maybe even impossible.

Good. Hold that feeling. We're going to use it.

Because if that's the outer edge of what compersion can look like, the question I want to sit with you in for the length of this post is a much simpler one. Can you feel genuine, wholehearted joy for your partner experiencing joy in any form at all? When they're happy in their work. When they're lost in a hobby. When they're laughing with a friend. When they're enjoying something that has absolutely nothing to do with you.

Can you feel that? Really feel it, with no agenda underneath it?

If the answer is anything other than a clean yes, this post is for you.

What Compersion Actually Is

The reason I love this word is that it's specific in a way that "love" never gets to be. Love is one of the most overloaded words in the English language. We love pizza. We love our mothers. We love a good sunset. The word has been stretched so thin it barely means anything anymore.

Compersion is precise. It describes a particular quality of feeling, a particular direction of energy. It's other-focused in the deepest sense, not as a strategy, not as a performance, but as the actual substance of the experience. Their joy lands in you as your joy. Not because of what it gives you. Just because they are someone you love and they are experiencing something good and that is enough.

Most of us have felt this at some point. Parents feel it watching their children. It's that thing that happens when a kid smiles and something lights up in you that has nothing to do with you at all. People feel it for their pets. You watch a dog lose its mind over a ball in a field and there's this pure delight that moves through you just because they're so completely happy.

We feel it at the beginning of relationships too. Early love has a lot of compersion in it. You want to know everything about this person. You light up when they light up. Their enthusiasm is contagious not because it's useful to you but because you're genuinely tuned in to their inner world and what you find there makes you glad.

And then something shifts.

The question this episode is built around is: what shifts, and why, and what does that shift tell us about the nature of what most people are calling love?

Love vs. Attachment: The Distinction That Changes Everything

Here's the definition of love I work from: unconditional acceptance of who someone is, right now, needing nothing from them.

Not who they could be. Not who they were when you fell for them. Not who they'll become if they just work on that one thing. Who they are, as they are, in this moment. And needing nothing from them in return.

I know that sounds simple. I also know that for most people in most long-term relationships, it describes something almost completely foreign to their actual experience.

Because what most of us drift into, gradually and often without noticing, is attachment. And attachment is a fundamentally different thing.

Attachment is when the other person becomes the variable that determines your internal state. When they're how you need them to be, you feel okay. When they're not, you don't. When they're happy, you can relax. When they're upset, you brace. When they do the thing you like, you feel loved. When they do the thing you don't like, the love goes somewhere.

Attachment isn't evil. It's human. It's the nervous system doing what nervous systems do, which is orient toward the people and things that feel like sources of safety and regulation. The problem isn't that it happens. The problem is that we call it love, and it isn't.

Love, as I'm defining it, doesn't need the other person to be anything. It's not contingent. It doesn't have terms. It doesn't monitor. It doesn't wait to see how they're going to show up before deciding how much to give.

Attachment does all of those things. Constantly. It's a continuous internal calculation: are you being the way I need you to be? Is what I'm getting from you enough? Are my conditions being met?

And here's the gut-check question I want you to sit with: if your partner never changed, if they stayed exactly as they are right now in every way, every habit, every pattern, every way they show up or fail to show up, could you feel love for them? Not tolerance. Not resignation. Love.

For most people, if they're honest, the answer is no. There's a list, even if it's unspoken. Things they wish were different. Ways they'd feel better if their partner would just adjust this one thing. The love is there, but it's conditional. It lives on the other side of a set of requirements.

That's not love. That's attachment. 

Why the Attachment Style Framework Misses the Point

Over the last several years, attachment theory has become the dominant lens through which people try to understand their relationship problems. Anxious attachment. Avoidant attachment. Disorganized attachment. Secure attachment. The language is everywhere now, in therapy offices and Instagram captions and couples' arguments.

And I want to be careful here, because attachment theory is genuinely useful to a point. It gives people a map of their patterns. It provides language for experiences that previously felt crazy or shameful. Understanding that your anxious response to a partner pulling away is a nervous system pattern rather than evidence that something is wrong with you, that's valuable. It can stop a lot of unnecessary suffering.

But here's where it stops being useful, and where I think it actively misleads people who want to experience real love.

The destination that attachment theory points toward is secure attachment. The goal is to become securely attached, or to find a securely attached partner, or ideally both. And secure attachment is described as the ability to feel safe and regulated in relationship, to not be destabilized by the normal fluctuations of closeness and distance, to trust that the bond is stable.

That sounds good. And it is better than the alternative. A securely attached person suffers less. Their relationships are more stable. The nervous system isn't constantly in alarm.

But secure attachment is still attachment.

It's a more comfortable, more functional, better-regulated version of the same fundamental orientation: you are organized around another person as a source of safety and regulation. The securely attached person has simply found an equilibrium where the other person's behavior falls within a range that feels manageable. When it steps outside that range, the security starts to erode.

Secure attachment is not love. Because attachment cannot ever be love. 

Compersion is how you know the difference.

A securely attached person might feel less threatened when their partner experiences joy independently. But can they feel that joy with them? Can they be genuinely delighted that this person they love is thriving, even when the thriving has nothing to do with them, even when it gives them nothing, even when it requires no response from them at all?

If the answer is still no, then the work of developing secure attachment has produced a more comfortable version of the same cage. The bars are softer. The anxiety is lower. But the fundamental orientation, using this other person to regulate yourself, hasn't changed.

The invitation I'm extending here isn't to do attachment better. It's to ask whether attachment, as a framework and a goal, is pointing at love at all. Because what attachment theory calls healthy love is really a description of how well two people's nervous systems fit together. And two people whose nervous systems have found a comfortable fit can still be completely unavailable to each other as actual, separate, whole human beings.

Real love requires the other person to be genuinely other. Not a mirror. Not a source of safety. Not a regulator. A complete, separate individual whose inner life you can be curious about and genuinely glad for, on its own terms, regardless of what it gives you.

Attachment theory, even at its best, doesn't take you there.

People Pleasing Is Not Love Either

There's another version of this I have to address, because a lot of people reading this will have already located the problem in their partner. He's the avoidant one. She's the one who can't meet my needs. They're the one with the attachment issues.

And so before we go further I want to talk about the other side of the coin, the one that looks like love from the outside but isn't.

People pleasing.

People pleasers often believe they're the loving ones in the relationship. They give so much. They're attentive. They sacrifice. They don't make a fuss. They anticipate needs before they're even expressed.

In D/s dynamics I see this frequently on both sides, submissives who are endlessly giving and accommodating, and dominants who are quietly working to never upset their partner, studying her moods, managing around her reactions, leading in a way that's really just elaborate conflict avoidance.

It looks like love. It isn't.

People pleasing is self-regulation wearing the mask of generosity. Underneath all that giving is a monitoring loop: is she okay? Does that mean I'm okay? Am I safe? The attentiveness is not actually about the other person. It's about managing your own anxiety by keeping the other person in a state that doesn't threaten you.

The difference between people pleasing and genuine love is the presence or absence of an agenda. Real love gives without strings. People pleasing gives in order to get, even if what it's trying to get is just the absence of conflict, or the feeling of being needed, or the temporary relief of someone else's approval.

There are strings. There are always strings. They might be invisible even to the person holding them, but they're there. And the moment those strings don't pay out what was expected, the resentment surfaces. And that resentment is the tell. You don't resent things you gave freely. You resent investments that didn't return.

Real love doesn't monitor. It witnesses. It doesn't give in order to receive. It gives because giving is the natural expression of what it feels. And the difference between those two things is everything.

Compersion as the Litmus Test

So if attachment isn't love, and people pleasing isn't love, what is the actual test?

Compersion.

Can you feel genuine, wholehearted joy for your partner's joy, with no secondary agenda, with nothing underneath it that you're trying to get or protect or manage?

Let me make this concrete. Not the extreme non-monogamy example, but the ordinary ones that are just as revealing.

Your partner is deeply happy in their work in a way that absorbs a lot of their energy and attention. Can you feel joy for that, really feel it, even when it means less of them for you?

Your partner has a friendship that lights them up, a connection you're not part of and don't fully understand. Can you feel glad that they have that?

Your partner wants to spend money on something you wouldn't choose. Can you feel happy for them enjoying that purchase?

Your partner is experiencing pleasure on their own, physically, a solo practice that has nothing to do with you. Can you meet that with warmth rather than threat?

Your partner succeeds at something, gets recognition, feels proud of themselves. Can you feel that with them, purely, without any quiet undercurrent of competition or comparison?

These are the ordinary compersion tests. And most people, if they're honest, will find places where the answer is no, or where there's a hesitation, a slight tightening, a "yes but." Those places are where attachment is running instead of love. Not as a judgment. As information.

Because you can't perform compersion. You can't read this and decide to go feel it. Either it's there or it isn't, and where it isn't is showing you exactly where you're still trying to control something.

Why We Withhold Real Love

If love as I'm defining it is always available, if it's the natural state underneath all the controlling and managing and monitoring, why don't we live there?

Because letting go of control feels like loss.

When you stop needing your partner to be different, you have to let go of the future you built in your head. The version of the relationship where they finally do the thing, finally stop doing the other thing, finally become the partner you've been waiting for.

That imagined future is load-bearing. It's where your hope lives. Letting it go feels like giving up on something real, even though what you're giving up is something that never existed.

There's a deeper layer too. Real love, unconditional love, includes the possibility of losing the person you love. Because if you love someone without conditions, you have to be willing for them to choose something or someone or some life that doesn't include you, and to want good things for them anyway.

That's the outer edge of it. But even short of that extreme, genuine love requires a tolerance for openness and uncertainty that attachment never allows.

Attachment is a strategy for guaranteeing connection. It tries to lock down the relationship, to make it secure, to build a structure where you know what you're getting. And that impulse makes complete sense given that most of us grew up in environments where love was conditional and inconsistent and sometimes frightening. Of course we learned to manage and control. Of course we built systems for making sure we wouldn't be abandoned.

But you can't love what you're controlling. The thing you're managing isn't the person. It's your own fear. And the more tightly you try to control the relationship, the less of the actual person you ever get to touch.

The Downward Spiral

Most relationships that are struggling are caught in a specific spiral. And once you see it, you see it everywhere.

It starts here: you need your partner to be different in order to be happy. Maybe you know exactly what you need. Maybe it's more vague than that, just a persistent sense of not quite being met, not quite getting what you need from them. But the underlying structure is the same: your happiness is located on the other side of them changing somehow. Maybe you'd feel okay if they didn't want so much. Or maybe you'd feel okay if they would just do this one thing. 

They feel this. Not necessarily consciously, not because you've said it out loud, but they feel it in the texture of your presence. It's in the way you look at them. It's in the slight tension that's always there. It's in the way conversations about certain topics always carry a low-level charge. They can feel that they are not enough for you as they are, or that they are too much for you because you aren't okay with them being themselves.

There is a version of them that would make you happy, and they are not it.

And so when they look back at you, what do they see? They see a person whose joy is on the other side of them changing. There is no available happiness in you right now. There is no present-moment joy they can meet or share or feel with you.

The real you, the person who has aliveness and delight and genuine presence, is gone. You've replaced yourself with a set of unmet conditions. You've said, in effect: I'm not available here. I'll be available when you're different.

Now ask yourself: can they feel compersion for you in that state? Can they actually love you? Can they feel genuine joy for your joy, when your joy doesn't exist yet, when it's contingent, when it's withheld behind a wall of what you need from them?

They can't. There's nothing to feel it for. You're not even there! Your entire being is buried behind your disapproval of them. 

You're saying...I'm unavailable until you're different. And that means, you're unavailable. 

And so they pull back, or they go through the motions, or they perform in the ways that keep the peace without really giving themselves. And you feel that withdrawal, that performance, and it confirms everything you already felt about not being met. So the need for them to be different intensifies. So the pressure increases. So they pull back further.

Round and round.

This is the state of most long-term relationships. Two people who have both made their happiness contingent on the other person changing, neither of them actually present, neither of them actually available to be loved, both of them performing some version of relationship while the real connection slowly suffocates.

And here is the thing that I think is the most important thing in this entire post: when you put your happiness on the other side of them changing, you don't just withhold love from them. You close yourself off from being loved. You make yourself unavailable. You put yourself in a cage and hand them the key and say "let me out when you're different."

There's nothing left of you to love. And they can feel that absence. And their heart closes in response to it. And the spiral locks in tighter.

The Way Out: Surrender

There is only one way out of this spiral, and it is surrender. Letting go. 

Surrender is going to feel like giving up. When I say let go of needing them to change, the nervous system hears "lower your standards." It hears "accept less than you deserve." It hears "stop fighting for the relationship you actually want." It hears "they're going to hurt you again."

That's what it feels like from inside the attachment. From inside the control strategy, releasing control looks like defeat.

What it actually does is remove the pressure that has been suffocating the relationship. When you genuinely stop needing your partner to be different, when you can look at them and feel love for who they actually are right now, something shifts in the entire dynamic. They can breathe. They can stop performing. They can stop bracing for the next reminder that they're not enough. They can just be themselves in your presence.

And a person who can breathe, a person who feels genuinely free in relationship with you, is capable of something that a person under pressure never is: they can choose to move toward you from real desire. Not from obligation. Not from guilt. Not from the weight of your need pressing on them. From their own genuine wanting.

You don't get that by tightening your grip. You only get it by opening your hand.

This is why surrender isn't giving up the relationship. It's giving up the control that was preventing the relationship from ever being what you actually wanted. The control was never going to get you there. It was always going to get you more performance, more going-through-the-motions, more of two people managing each other at a safe distance while calling it love.

Real intimacy, the kind where two people are actually present to each other as separate, whole, living individuals, only happens in the absence of that pressure. It requires enough spaciousness for each person to actually show up as themselves. Control doesn't create that spaciousness. Surrender does.

A New Definition of Love

So what is love? What does it mean to actually love someone?

Love is not the warm feeling you get when your partner is showing up the way you want them to. That's attachment feeling satisfied. It feels good, but it's contingent on their performance, and the moment the performance shifts, so does the feeling.

Love is not the attentiveness of someone who is constantly monitoring and giving and anticipating. That's self-regulation in generous clothing.

Love is not even secure attachment, the comfortable equilibrium of two well-matched nervous systems. That's a functional arrangement. It minimizes suffering. It doesn't describe love.

Love is genuine care for another person's experience, independent of what it gives you. It's the capacity to be present to who they actually are, in this moment, without needing them to be different. It's available all the time, not because you generate it but because it's what's there when you stop layering conditions over it.

And the proof of it, the felt evidence that you've actually arrived there, is compersion. The ability to feel joy for their joy. Not joy because their joy benefits you. Not relief because their happiness makes your life easier. Just clean, simple, wholehearted gladness that this person you love is alive and experiencing something good.

That feeling doesn't require them to be a certain way. It doesn't monitor or manage or wait. It just meets them where they are and finds something worth loving there. Even if sometimes, the way that shows up is in a way that you might not have preferred. Because it's not about you anymore. 

It's about the person you love enjoying their life for themselves. Because to actually love, we have to BE love, and share that love. It's not about what we get out of it at all. 

At. All. 

Unconditional acceptance. Selfless, sympathetic joy, without a strategy. 

That's what love actually is. And getting there isn't a technique you can apply or a framework you can adopt.

It's what becomes available when you're willing to let go of everything you've been using to try to control it.

You can only surrender your way to this kind of true love. You can't "get there". You can only allow it to exist, because it won't be controlled, performed, or strategized.

The control was never protecting you. It was just self protection keeping true joy at arm's length... and calling itself love in the meantime.

If this episode hit something for you, come continue the conversation in the Infinite Devotion Community. It's $30 a year, 200+ members, and a place to go deeper than a podcast episode allows.

Listen to the full episode on Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

Explore all courses and offerings at infinitedevotion.com/store